Australian Tax "CHOICE PRINCIPLE"[next]
AITAA PART IVA anti Avoidance Legislation
"DUTY of CARE"
"Parliament having prescribed the circumstances which will attract tax, or provide occasion for its reduction or elimination, the citizen has every right to mold the transaction into which he is about to enter into a form which satisfies the requirements of the statute...[It cannot] matter that *his choice of transaction was influenced wholly or in part by its effect upon his obligation to pay tax."
High Court of Australia
Judicial Notice of Chief Justice Sir Garfield Barwick
*Consider the four options or his choices all patriotic Australian people have on Income Tax:
(1) Not pay
(2) Pay Tax and/or:
(3) Create the Wealth of our Nation and/or:
(4) A bit of all Three.
Part IVA anti-Avoidance Legislation:
"arrangements of a normal business or family kind, including those of a TaxPlanning nature" would be beyond its scope.
"is designed to operate against "blantant, artificial, or contrived arrangements, but not cast unnecessary inhibitions on normal commercial transactions by which taxpayers legitimately take advantages of opportunities available for the arrangement of their affairs"
NB. A person
who, by fair means or foul, contrives to relieve another person of his "Freedom of
Choice" to act and that person suffers a financial loss or disadvantage, the person
responsible for that loss of Freedom may be deemed to have acted negligently in his
"Duty of Care" ------ it may be that a case in Common Law exists to reclaim that
"The Duty of Care":
(Judicial Notice - Supreme Court of N.S.W.)
----- "an accountant or solicitor who fails to give any consideration to lawful tax minimization structures which reasonably should be known or discoverable at the time a matter is current would, prima facie, be professionally negligent, unless there is an express disclaimer (which should be confirmed in writing) that no advice on revenue aspects, including stamp duty is proffered. Indeed, an accountant or solicitor should also consider the tax position of others who might reasonably be foreseen to be affected (e.g. Beneficiaries of a trust or shareholders in a company), as a duty of care may be owed to them".
Bayer v Balkin (95 ATC 4609)
Most Solicitors, Financial Advisers and Accountants are employees and are not allowed by their employers or principals, to give advice on tax matters - and so indicate their "express disclaimer" in writing (er - sometimes). The ATO s251M Negligence Clause also causes them concern as they can be fined by the ATO and sued in a Common Law Claim by the Tax Payer badly advised.
More Info? Click here
Workers' Union Officials:
All Union Officials are critical of the rich man's ability to TaxPlan to excite the poor workers. Thus most Government Employees (including teachers) are reluctant to go against the Union rules - even though Tax Planning is a Freedom of Choice and a Right guaranteed by our Australian Federal Constitution and the High Court of Australia.
all Government Employees -- and Unions --have a "duty of care".
The Freedom of Choice is not on the agenda of the Unions - for their members - and not likely to be in the foreseeable future. Freedom of Choice is not a choice for Servants - Public or Private.
Poor Peoples' Verdict:
"The rich should be made to pay more tax so we can have more income on welfare".
Rich Peoples' Verdict:
"So! Move the factory offshore where the workers are more patriotic and more willing to work".
For Information on Taxation don't hesitate to check with the Australian Taxation Office Web Site:
infoline Ph 13 61 40
The Gold Coast TaxPlanning/Croquet Seminars:
Will not only teach you how to play Croquet but how to TaxPlan to Sponsor yourself in Competition.
[NEXT] [BACK] [THIS INDEX] [MAIN INDEX] [COMMENT] [HOME PAGE] [E.mail]
More Info? Click here